| 1 |
Delivered-To: ennael1@gmail.com
|
| 2 |
Received: by 10.76.82.164 with SMTP id j4csp86039oay;
|
| 3 |
Mon, 14 May 2012 15:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
|
| 4 |
Received: by 10.180.79.72 with SMTP id h8mr24318851wix.1.1337035271405;
|
| 5 |
Mon, 14 May 2012 15:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
|
| 6 |
Return-Path: <board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org>
|
| 7 |
Received: from alamut.mageia.org (alamut.mageia.org. [212.85.158.146])
|
| 8 |
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n59si20628523wel.141.2012.05.14.15.41.10;
|
| 9 |
Mon, 14 May 2012 15:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
|
| 10 |
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org designates 212.85.158.146 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.85.158.146;
|
| 11 |
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org designates 212.85.158.146 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org
|
| 12 |
Received: by alamut.mageia.org (Postfix, from userid 486)
|
| 13 |
id B02EB44643; Tue, 15 May 2012 00:41:10 +0200 (CEST)
|
| 14 |
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
|
| 15 |
by alamut.mageia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5417544643
|
| 16 |
for <board-private@ml.mageia.org>; Tue, 15 May 2012 00:41:09 +0200 (CEST)
|
| 17 |
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mageia.org
|
| 18 |
Received: from alamut.mageia.org ([127.0.0.1])
|
| 19 |
by localhost (alamut.mageia.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025)
|
| 20 |
with ESMTP id JEa8QFY9qRnj for <board-private@ml.mageia.org>;
|
| 21 |
Tue, 15 May 2012 00:41:08 +0200 (CEST)
|
| 22 |
Received: from mx1.mars-attacks.org (invaders.mars-attacks.org [88.191.83.84])
|
| 23 |
by alamut.mageia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E875445E5
|
| 24 |
for <board-private@ml.mageia.org>; Tue, 15 May 2012 00:41:08 +0200 (CEST)
|
| 25 |
Received: by mx1.mars-attacks.org (Postfix, from userid 500)
|
| 26 |
id 81586280874E; Tue, 15 May 2012 00:41:06 +0200 (CEST)
|
| 27 |
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 00:41:06 +0200
|
| 28 |
From: nicolas vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org>
|
| 29 |
To: board-private@ml.mageia.org
|
| 30 |
Message-ID: <20120514224106.GF21938@mars-attacks.org>
|
| 31 |
References: <4FB16CC3.7020309@gmail.com> <4FB16DF6.2050001@googlemail.com> <4FB16E9C.7020903@gmail.com> <4FB17214.7010501@googlemail.com> <20120514212033.GE21938@mars-attacks.org> <CANa9xwtrcKYD5NUK=pH3xZUMOK3xPSWYKRhmM2TTpQGNidYKDw@mail.gmail.com>
|
| 32 |
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
| 33 |
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
|
| 34 |
Content-Disposition: inline
|
| 35 |
In-Reply-To: <CANa9xwtrcKYD5NUK=pH3xZUMOK3xPSWYKRhmM2TTpQGNidYKDw@mail.gmail.com>
|
| 36 |
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
|
| 37 |
Subject: Re: [board-private] News from Mandriva
|
| 38 |
X-Loop: board-private@ml.mageia.org
|
| 39 |
X-Sequence: 35
|
| 40 |
Errors-to: board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org
|
| 41 |
Precedence: list
|
| 42 |
Precedence: bulk
|
| 43 |
Sender: board-private-request@ml.mageia.org
|
| 44 |
X-no-archive: yes
|
| 45 |
List-Id: <board-private.ml.mageia.org>
|
| 46 |
List-Help: <mailto:sympa@ml.mageia.org?subject=help>
|
| 47 |
List-Subscribe: <mailto:sympa@ml.mageia.org?subject=subscribe%20board-private>
|
| 48 |
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sympa@ml.mageia.org?subject=unsubscribe%20board-private>
|
| 49 |
List-Post: <mailto:board-private@ml.mageia.org>
|
| 50 |
List-Owner: <mailto:board-private-request@ml.mageia.org>
|
| 51 |
List-Archive: <https://ml.mageia.org/l/arc/board-private>
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
On Mon, 14 May 2012, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
|
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:20 PM, nicolas vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org> wrote:
|
| 56 |
> > Yes I think it should be clear that Mageia doesn't do anything special
|
| 57 |
> > for Mandriva, which is treated like any other contributor, and is
|
| 58 |
> > independant. Maybe we can prepare a blog post to publish after the
|
| 59 |
> > announce from Mandriva to remind this and avoid possible misunderstandings ?
|
| 60 |
>
|
| 61 |
> Yes, however I think we should not insist on the possible
|
| 62 |
> misunderstandings in our communication/discussion, but focus on the
|
| 63 |
> good parts, questions will come afterwise (and that's good too):
|
| 64 |
>
|
| 65 |
> - it's great, for everyone, because Mageia is a strong platform;
|
| 66 |
> Mandriva will benefit from it for their server product; and Mageia
|
| 67 |
> will benefit from it from possible Mandriva contributions;
|
| 68 |
> - it shows that Mageia has reached quite a milestone;
|
| 69 |
> - it's not revolutionary (Mageia is expected to be used for
|
| 70 |
> derivative projects), but it's cool to see Mandriva acknowledge what
|
| 71 |
> we did, in some way;
|
| 72 |
> - of course, this does not impact how the project is governed,
|
| 73 |
> because it's unrelated.
|
| 74 |
>
|
| 75 |
> If we keep on insisting at first on the potential misunderstandings,
|
| 76 |
> people will focus on that. And the core news is not about potential
|
| 77 |
> mishaps, but about a company that is using technology from a open
|
| 78 |
> source project for their own products.
|
| 79 |
>
|
| 80 |
> Of course, if people raise questions, and only then, it will be a good
|
| 81 |
> time to reassure everyone. It's better to do it in this order, because
|
| 82 |
> it will let us know what are exactly the concerns of people out there,
|
| 83 |
> instead of guessing about these.
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
I think we should not wait for people to raise questions about this, or
|
| 86 |
it will be too late. When the announce of Mageia was done, I have seen
|
| 87 |
a lot of people comparing Mandriva/Mageia with RedHat/Fedora, although
|
| 88 |
the announcement was quite clear that it is not the same.
|
| 89 |
|
| 90 |
If we don't explain this clearly and don't insist on it, a lot of people
|
| 91 |
will immediately think it is the same as RedHat/Fedora, or that Mandriva
|
| 92 |
and Mageia will merge.
|
| 93 |
|
Parent Directory
| 
Revision Log